Combination of Hypoxic Preconditioning and Postconditioning Does Not Induce Additive Protection of Ex Vivo Human Skeletal Muscle From Hypoxia/Reoxygenation Injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We previously demonstrated that hypoxic preconditioning (HPreC) or postconditioning (HPostC) protected ex vivo human skeletal muscle from hypoxia/reoxygenation injury. Here, we investigated if combined HPreC and HPostC could convey additive protection. Human rectus abdominis muscle strips were cultured in normoxic Krebs buffer for 5 hours (control) or in 3 hours hypoxic/2 hours normoxic buffer (treatment groups). HPreC and HPostC were induced by 1 cycle of 5 minutes hypoxia/5 minutes reoxygenation immediately before or after 3 hours hypoxia, respectively. Muscle injury, viability, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis were assessed by measuring lactate dehydrogenase release, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide reduction, and ATP content, respectively. Hypoxia/reoxygenation caused lactate dehydrogenase to increase and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide reduction and ATP content to decrease (P < 0.05; n = 7). HPreC, HPostC, and combination of both were equally effective in protection of muscle from hypoxia/reoxygenation injury. Atractyloside (5 × 10 M), a mitochondrial permeability transition pore opener, abolished the protective effect of HPreC or HPostC. We conclude that HPreC and HPostC protect ex vivo human skeletal muscle against hypoxia/reoxygenation injury by closing the mitochondrial permeability transition pore. For that reason, they are equally effective and do not demonstrate an additive effect. Moreover, the potent effect of HPostC indicates ischemic postconditioning as an effective clinical intervention against reperfusion injury in autogenous skeletal muscle transplantation and replantation surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".