MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334089083 · doi:10.1109/ted.2014.2348540

Lateral Organic Semiconductor Photodetector. Part I: Use of an Insulating Layer for Low Dark Current

2014· article· en· W2334089083 on OpenAlexaff
Umar Shafique, Clara Santato, Karim S. Karim

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Electron Devices · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotodetectorDark currentMaterials scienceImage sensorOptoelectronicsOrganic semiconductorSemiconductorComputer scienceElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thin flexible, lightweight nature of organic semiconductor devices makes them a prime candidate for medical imaging applications such as rugged X-ray imagers for use in hospitals (i.e., immune to minor drops or shocks) or even curved X-ray imagers for specialized imaging modalities of the future (e.g., compression free breast imaging). However, the performance of these organic sensors is not yet comparable with current technology (amorphous silicon) in particular owing to high dark currents. Here we show that the use of an insulator material, such as polystyrene, can dramatically improve the dark current performance of the organic photoconductor without compromising the device speed. Consequently, we are able to operate the sensor under high bias to achieve significant improvements in the critical parameters for image sensors such as photo-to-dark current ratio, sensitivity, dynamic range, and transient speed. Our work has the potential to expedite the adoption of organic semiconductor technology for a variety of digital imaging applications especially in the field of low-cost, portable biomedical equipment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Electron DevicesSame topicOrganic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207