Molecular Recognition of Steroid Hormones in the Solid State: Stark Differences in Cocrystallization of β-Estradiol and Estrone
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While the understanding of the supramolecular chemistry of steroidal hormones is largely based on receptor binding studies in vitro and in vivo, their solid-state molecular recognition properties remain unexplored. Here, we use mechanochemical cocrystallization and single crystal X-ray structure analysis to gain insight into the solid-state complexation of sex hormones with arenes, by systematic investigation of the ability of two important estrogens ß-estradiol ( bes ) and estrone ( est ) to form cocrystals with 1,2-dimethylnaphthalene, phenanthrene, anthracene, 9,10-anthraquinone, phenanthridine, benzo[h]quinoline, and perfluoronaphthalene. Cocrystallization of bes reveals the formation of a novel hydrogen-bonded lattice host, exhibiting rectangular channels occupied by arene guests. In striking contrast to bes, its 17-keto-analogue est did not yield cocrystals with any of the explored arenes except perfluoronaphthalene, revealing association via arene-perfluorarene π···π stacking. The results reveal previously unknown solid-state complexation behavior of important estrogen hormones, demonstrating how minor changes in the steroid structure, in particular switching from a 17-hydroxyl to a 17-keto group, can result in extraordinary changes to their solid-state self-assembly. In that respect, solid-state chemistry of steroids appears to mirror their important signaling role in biological systems, as very small modifications to the steroid structure lead to large changes in cocrystallization propensity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it