Dietary Bioaccumulation of Perfluorophosphonates and Perfluorophosphinates in Juvenile Rainbow Trout: Evidence of Metabolism of Perfluorophosphinates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The perfluorophosphonates (PFPAs) and perfluorophosphinates (PFPiAs) are high production volume chemicals that have been observed in Canadian surface waters and wastewater environments. To examine whether their occurrence would result in contamination of organisms in aquatic ecosystems, juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were separately exposed to a mixture of C6, C8, and C10 monoalkylated PFPAs and a mixture of C6/C6, C6/C8, and C8/C8 dialkylated PFPiAs in the diet for 31 days, followed by 32 days of depuration. Tissue distribution indicated preferential partitioning to blood and liver. Depuration half-lives ranged from 3 to 43 days and increased with the number of perfluorinated carbons present in the chemical. The assimilation efficiencies (α, 7-34%) and biomagnification factors (BMFs, 0.007-0.189) calculated here for PFPAs and PFPiAs were lower than those previously observed for the perfluorocarboxylates (PFCAs) and perfluorosulfonates (PFSAs) in the same test organism. Bioaccumulation was observed to decreased in the order of PFSAs > PFCAs > PFPAs of equal perfluorocarbon chain length and was dependent on the charge of the polar headgroup. Bioaccumulation of the PFPiAs was observed to be low due to their rapid elimination via metabolism to the corresponding PFPAs. Here, we report the first observation of an in vivo cleavage of the carbon-phosphorus bond in fish, as well as, the first in vivo biotransformation of a perfluoroalkyl acid (PFAA). As was previously observed for PFCAs and PFSAs, none of the BMFs determined here for the PFPAs and PFPiAs were greater than one, which suggests PFAAs do not biomagnify from dietary exposure in juvenile rainbow trout.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".