MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evaluation of families with a member with mental illness: a bibliographic study

2011· article· en· W2334193178 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
João Batista Silva Filho, Adriana Gomes Nogueira Ferreira, Eliany Nazaré Oliveira, Cibelly Aliny Lima Siqueira Freitas, Juliana Gomes Nogueira, Fabiane do Amaral Gubert

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Enfermagem UFPE on line · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSciELOMental healthPsychologyMental illnessInclusion (mineral)RehabilitationPsychiatryHumanitiesMedicineMEDLINESocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACTObjective: to analyze surveys, available electronically, addressing the evaluation of families with a member with mental illness in the period 2000 to 2010. Methodology: this is a literature search in databases: LILACS, SciELO and BDENF. Inclusion criteria were considered studies that focused on assessment of families, published in English in the period 2000-2010, which had the subject of healthcare professionals and family members of clients with mental illness. Results: the survey with the word Calgary and the descriptors Family Relations and Mental Patients selected nine articles. These studies, most were qualitative studies, which reported the importance of social rehabilitation of the person with mental disorder. The articles analyzed culminated in four themes, which addressed the Psychiatric Reform, living with a mental patient, family burden and the contribution of health professionals to the family of the mental patients. Conclusion: this study indicates the need for nursing to promote more studies focused on evaluation of families with members with mental suffering, based on Calgary model - that according to the analyzed material proves to be a valid and reliable instrument for care in the family. Descriptors: family relationships; mental patients; nursing.RESUMOObjetivo: analisar pesquisas, disponíveis eletronicamente, que abordem a avaliação de famílias com um membro com doença mental, no período de 2000 a 2010. Metodologia: trata-se de uma pesquisa bibliográfica nas bases de dados: LILACS, BDENF e ScieLO. Como critérios de inclusão foram considerados estudos que abordassem avaliação de famílias, divulgados em língua portuguesa, no período de 2000 a 2010, que tivessem como sujeitos profissionais da saúde e familiares de clientes com transtorno mental. Resultados: a pesquisa realizada com a palavra Calgary e com os descritores Relações familiares e Doentes mentais selecionou nove artigos. Desses estudos, a maior parte foram pesquisas qualitativas, que relataram a importância da reinserção social do sujeito com transtorno mental. Os artigos analisados culminaram em quatro categorias temáticas, que abordaram a Reforma Psiquiátrica, a convivência com um doente mental, sobrecarga familiar e a contribuição dos profissionais de saúde para com a família de doentes mentais. Conclusão: a pesquisa evidencia a necessidade de a enfermagem promover mais estudos voltados à avaliação de famílias com membros em sofrimento mental, baseada no Modelo Calgary visto que segundo os materiais analisados demonstra ser um instrumento válido e confiável para o cuidado na família. Descritores: relações familiares; doentes mentais; enfermagem.RESUMENObjetivo: analizar investigaciones, disponibles electrónicamente, que aborden la evaluación de familias con un miembro con enfermedad mental, en el periodo de 2000 a 2010. Metodología: se trata de una investigación bibliográfica en las bases de datos: LILACS, BDENF y ScieLO. Como criterios de inclusión fueron considerados estudios que abordasen: evaluaciónes de familias, divulgados en lengua portuguesa, en el período de 2000 a 2010, que tuviesen como sujetos profesionales de salud y familiares de clientes con trastorno mental. Resultados: la investigación realizada con la palabra Calgary y con los descriptores Relaciones familiares y Enfermos mentales seleccionó nueve artículos. De estos estudios, la mayor parte fueron investigaciones cualitativas, que relataron la importancia de la reinserción social del sujeto con trastorno mental. Los artículos analizados culminaron en cuatro categorías temáticas, que abordaron la Reforma Psiquiátrica, la convivencia con un enfermo mental, sobrecarga familiar y la contribución de los profesionales de salud con la familia de enfermos mentales. Conclusión: la investigación evidencia la necesidad de que la enfermería promueva más estudios dirigidos a la evaluación de familias con miembros con sufrimiento mental, basada en el Modelo Calgary ya que según los materiales analizados demuestra ser un instrumento válido y confiable para el cuidado en la familia. Descriptores: relaciones familiares; enfermos mentales; enfermería.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Enfermagem UFPE on lineSame topicFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessFrench-language works237,207