MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

P1-06-08: Effect of Treatment Emergent Symptoms on Relapse Free Survival: NCIC CTG MA.12 a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Tamoxifen after Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Pre-Menopausal Women in Early Breast Cancer.

2011· article· en· W2334199519 on OpenAlexaff
J-AW Chapman, LE Shepherd, Aurélie Le Maître, Kathleen I. Pritchard, BC Graham, KA Gelmon, V H Bramwell

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research CentreQueen's UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVasomotorBreast cancerTamoxifenPlaceboAdverse effectRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineJoint painCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Evidence from the ATAC trial that vasomotor or joint symptomatology by 3 months is associated with reduced recurrence after 3 months led to an interest in examining this phenomenon in other aromatase inhibitor trials. We examined here whether there is such an association in the context of a placebo-controlled tamoxifen therapy trial. Methods: NCIC CTG MA.12 is a randomized placebo-controlled trial of tamoxifen (TAM) after adjuvant chemotherapy for pre-menopausal women with early breast cancer. Eligible patients were included if they received some protocol therapy, were alive and disease-free at 3 months: 1.) without prior grade 3/4 vasomotor or joint symptoms (N=293; only 3 patients had prior grade 1/2 vasomotor or joint symptoms); separately, 2.) all patients with/without prior vasomotor or joint symptoms (N=631). Vasomotor symptom at 3 months was adverse reporting of any grade of hot flashes and/or sweating, while joint symptom was any adverse event reporting of pain -joint, pain -muscle, pain -bone, arthritis, joint -function, or musculoskeletal —other. Exact Fisher tests were used to examine associations between baseline patient and tumour characteristics, treatment arm, and the development of symptomatology. Univariate testing of effect of symptomatology on relapse-free survival (RFS) was with a stratified Cox model, and multivariate was with stratified step-wise forward Cox modeling. Results: MA.12 accrued 672 patients, and the median follow-up for this investigation was 9.7 years. Excluding patients with prior vasomotor or joint symptoms, 27.3% of 293 patients reported vasomotor or joint symptoms by three months, all of which was vasomotor. Meanwhile, 20.8% of all 631 patients had symptomatology by 3 months: 19.2% reported vasomotor alone, 1.1% joint alone, and 0.5% both. With no prior symptoms, 23.4% on placebo (P) and 31.7% on TAM developed symptomatology; age was the only baseline factor with significant differences at 3 months (p=0.01), with under 40 years 18% of women on TAM and 8% on P, and 50 or older, 21% on TAM and 14% on P being symptomatic. For all patients, 20.1% on P and 21.4% on TAM reported symptomatology by 3 months, and there was weak evidence that those >50 on TAM had more symptoms (p=0.06). Vasomotor and joint symptoms did not exhibit significant univariate or multivariate effects on RFS (without prior symptoms, respectively, p=0.98 and p=0.90; for all patients, p=0.99 and p=0.93). Discussion: We did not observe any association of vasomotor or joint symptoms by 3 months and relapse-free survival after 3 months in the MA.12 placebo-controlled trial of tamoxifen therapy in premenopausal women. This mirrors the results we observed in our MA.27 trial of exemestane versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women, and points to the simple metric of early symptomatology not being a universal predictor of reduced relapse. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-06-08.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicEstrogen and related hormone effects→French-language works237,207→