MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2334238127 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2011-566

Abstract 566: Role of bone marrow derived cells in response to ionizing radiation in normal brain

2011· article· en· W2334238127 on OpenAlexaff
Kelly Burrell, Salomeh Jelveh, Shahrzad Jalali, Richard Hill, Gelareh Zadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsCentre for Social InnovationUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathologyBone marrowGliomaIn vivomCherryMedicineCancer researchGreen fluorescent proteinBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Radiation therapy (RTx) plays a critical role in treatment of malignant gliomas however the biological response to ionizing radiation (IR) in normal brain and brain tumors is poorly understood. We postulate that Bone Marrow Derived Progenitor Cells (BMDC) are involved in modulating radiation response in normal brain and brain tumor vasculature. Methods: Animal Models: Bone marrow of NOD/SCID mice were stably reconstituted with BM harvested from green-fluorescent protein transgenic mice. Intracranial (ic) xenografts were generated in intracranial window models (ICW) using U87 glioma cells stably expressing mCherry. RTx: Using locally designed x-ray micro-irradiator stereotactic radiation was delivered through ICW to normal brain or U87-mCherry ic-xenografts, treated with two fractionated regimens of 3×2Gy, 3×5Gy and single radiation doses of 2, 6, 8 and 15 Gy. RTx alone to normal brain was compared to RTx to U87-mCherry ic-xenografts and sham needle injection alone (15 mice each). In-vivo imaging: Two-photon laser capture microscopy was used to obtain high-resolution real-time in-vivo longitudinal images of the tumor cells, tumor vasculature and tracing of the circulating GFP+BM cells. Mice were imaged 1d,2d,3d,7d,10d,14d,21d & 30d following cell implantation or RTx. Histological Analysis: Mice were sacrificed using perfusion fixation and brains collected for correlative immunohistochemical and Immunofluorescent analysis. Results: In normal brain there is a dose dependent recruitment of BMDC to site of IR, in addition to a temporal response.BMDC is seen as early as 12hrs post IR and persists beyond 30 days, which is in contrast to needle injection alone where BMDC dissipate after 7 days. BMDC recruited to sites of IR in normal brain do not migrate outside of the radiation field and do not differentiate into other cell types, which is in striking contrast to glioma intracranial models, where tumor cells trigger a distinct differentiation of BMDC into macrophages, GFAP+astrocytes and monocytes that migrate beyond the irradiated zone. In both normal brain and brain tumor associated vasculature, following IR, BMDC integrates into the vasculature as pericytes and not endothelial cells. At higher radiation doses there is increased BMDC integration into both normal and tumor associated vessels. Conclusions: Our results are the first to demonstrate an early dose dependent recruitment of BMDC to site of IR in normal brain. BMDCs recruited to site of IR require a second signal, such as oncogenic signal from glioma cells, in order to differentiate to form other cell types such as GFAP+astrocytes, Macrophage+ and Monocyte+ cells. Increased integration of BMDC into the vasculature as perictyes following IR is suggestive of a protective role of BMDC. It is conceivable that the recruitment of BMDC to site of radiation in normal brain can be used towards a protective therapeutic strategy against adverse radiation effects. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 566. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-566

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→