Conformational defects underlie proteasomal degradation of Dent's disease-causing mutants of ClC-5
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mutations in the CLCN5 (chloride channel, voltage-sensitive 5) gene cause Dent's disease because they reduce the functional expression of the ClC-5 chloride/proton transporter in the recycling endosomes of proximal tubule epithelial cells. The majority (60%) of these disease-causing mutations in ClC-5 are misprocessed and retained in the ER (endoplasmic reticulum). Importantly, the structural basis for misprocessing and the cellular destiny of such ClC-5 mutants have yet to be defined. A ClC-5 monomer comprises a short N-terminal region, an extensive membrane domain and a large C-terminal domain. The recent crystal structure of a eukaryotic ClC (chloride channel) transporter revealed the intimate interaction between the membrane domain and the C-terminal region. Therefore we hypothesized that intramolecular interactions may be perturbed in certain mutants. In the present study we examined two misprocessed mutants: C221R located in the membrane domain and R718X, which truncates the C-terminal domain. Both mutants exhibited enhanced protease susceptibility relative to the normal protein in limited proteolysis studies, providing direct evidence that they are misfolded. Interestingly, the membrane-localized mutation C221R led to enhanced protease susceptibility of the cytosolic N-terminal region, and the C-terminal truncation mutation R718X led to enhanced protease susceptibility of both the cytosolic C-terminal and the membrane domain. Together, these studies support the idea that certain misprocessing mutations alter intramolecular interactions within the full-length ClC-5 protein. Further, we found that these misfolded mutants are polyubiquitinated and targeted for proteasomal degradation in the OK (opossum kidney) renal epithelial cells, thereby ensuring that they do not elicit the unfolded protein response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".