MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334475069 · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvu086.3

286Cardioprotective potential of subcutaneous and visceral adipose-derived stem cells

2014· article· en· W2334475069 on OpenAlexaff
Chao Chi, Bo Xiang, JX Deng, HY Lin, Kanmani Natarajan, Francis Lin, Hongyuan Liu, DH Freed, Arora Rc, GH Tian

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiovascular Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdipose tissueStem cellHeart failureMedicineCardiac function curveSubcutaneous adipose tissueInternal medicineCardiologyBiologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Adipose-derived stem cells (ASC) from both subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissues have been studied individually and separately. No studies have been performed to directly compare their biological properties and therapeutic function in treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF). This study was therefore designed to comparatively analyze their biological properties and cardiac therapeutic function. Methods: Rat subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissues were excised for isolation of ASC. Morphology, yield, proliferation, surface markers, differentiation potential, and cytokine secretion of the subcutaneous ASC (S-ASC) and visceral ASC (V-ASC) were analyzed. To assess their therapeutic capacity, a rat model of myocardial infarction (MI) was established by occlusion of the LAD. Seven days after the LAD occlusion, S-ASC (n = 11), V-ASC (n = 11), and cell culture medium (n = 7) were injected into the infarct rim, respectively. Cardiac function of the infarcted hearts was then monitored with MRI for six months. Results: Both S-ASC and V-ASC exhibited a fibroblast-like morphology and expressed stromal cell markers (CD29, 90 and 105). No significant expression of hematopoietic markers (CD11b, 34 and 45) was detected. Under appropriate conditions, both cells could differentiate to adipocyte- and osteocyte-like cells. Both of them expressed a significant level of HGF, IGF and VEGF. As to their differences, visceral fat tissue had a 3-times greater yield of ASC relative to subcutaneous fat. Moreover, V-ASC showed a lower colony-formation rate (9.8±1.0%) compared to S-ASC (13.5±2.6%). In contrast, S-ASC showed a significantly greater growth rate (Doubling time, 17.9±0.9 hours in first two weeks) relative to V-ASC (Doubling time, 26.0±2.6 hours in first two weeks). Both S-ASC and V-ASC-treated hearts showed a significantly greater left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 58.3±14.5% and 56.7±3.1%) than the control hearts (LVEF, 47.2±15.9%) at end of six months of recovery period. LVEF between the two ASC-treated groups was not significantly different. Finally, the implanted stem cells were readily detected in vivo with MRI for 6 months. Myocardial tissue sections showed existence of ASC and their locations matched with MRI signals. Conclusions: S-ASC and V-ASC share several major biological characteristics. Both provide comparable significant improvement on cardiac function. We conclude that the subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissues are equally effective cell sources for cell therapy of congestive heart failure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.386
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiovascular ResearchSame topicCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityFrench-language works237,207