MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334495287 · doi:10.1109/tmbmc.2016.2537299

Dynamic Modeling of Antimicrobial Pore Formation in Engineered Tethered Membranes

2015· article· en· W2334495287 on OpenAlexaff
William Hoiles, Vikram Krishnamurthy

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Molecular Biological and Multi-Scale Communications · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMembraneMesoscopic physicsMolecular dynamicsChemistryDiffusionMaterials scienceNanotechnologyBiophysicsChemical physicsPhysicsComputational chemistryThermodynamicsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a mesoscopic-to-observable dynamic model of the pore formation measurement platform is presented. The platform is composed of a controllable engineered tethered membrane. Using the mesoscopic-to-observable model and experimental measurements allows the platform to be used to gain insight into the pore formation dynamics of peptides in biological membranes. These results are useful for the development of novel drugs, gene delivery therapies, and controlling pore formation in cell-like bioreactors. The model consists of coarse-grained molecular dynamics, a continuum model composed of a generalized version of Fick's law of diffusion coupled with surface reaction-diffusion equations, and a fractional order macroscopic model. We consider the pore formation dynamics of the antimicrobial peptide PGLa using the dynamic model and experimental measurements from the platform. The results provide a possible reaction-mechanism for PGLa pore formation in charged and uncharged membranes, which accounts for binding, translocation, and oligomerization of PGLa. The reaction-mechanism suggests that PGLa not only increases the number of pores in negatively charged membranes, but also increases the lifetime of pores compared to PGLa pores in uncharged membranes. Though results for PGLa are presented, the dynamics model and platform can be used to investigate the pore formation dynamics of other peptides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Molecular Biological and Multi-Scale CommunicationsSame topicBacteriophages and microbial interactionsFrench-language works237,207