Determination of Trimebutine and Desmethyl-trimebutine in Human Plasma by HPLC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A simple and sensitive HPLC method has been developed to measure trimebutine (CAS 39133-31-8, maleate: CAS 34140-59-5) and its main metabolite desmethyl-trimebutine in human plasma. The method was validated according to the Washington Consensus Conference on the Validation of Analytical Methods. It involved extraction of the plasma with n-hexane containing 2-pentanol, followed by reversed-phase HPLC using a Partisil ODS2 10 microns column and UV detection at 265 nm. The retention times of the internal standard (procaine), desmethyl-trimebutine and trimebutine were 2.4, 4.3 and 6.5 min, respectively. The standard curves were linear from 20 ng.ml-1 (limit of quantitation) to 5000 ng.ml-1 for both compounds. The coefficient of variation for all the criteria of validation were less than 15%. The extraction recoveries obtained for trimebutine and desmethyl-trimebutine were about 90%. Both compounds were very stable upon storage in plasma. The method was tested by measuring the plasma concentrations following oral administration to humans during a bioequivalence study and was shown suitable for pharmacokinetic studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".