SSA 2003 Annual Meeting Presidential Address: Reflections on the Role of Technology in Seismology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| November 01, 2003 SSA 2003 Annual Meeting Presidential Address: Reflections on the Role of Technology in Seismology Gail Atkinson Gail Atkinson Department of Earth Sciences Carleton University Ottawa, ON Canada K1S 5B6 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Seismological Research Letters (2003) 74 (6): 817–819. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.74.6.817 Article history first online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Gail Atkinson; SSA 2003 Annual Meeting Presidential Address: Reflections on the Role of Technology in Seismology. Seismological Research Letters 2003;; 74 (6): 817–819. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.74.6.817 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search Let me begin by saying how much I have appreciated the opportunity to be President of SSA these last two years. It has been a pleasure and a privilege to work with our dedicated SSA staff and Board of Directors, and our talented membership of seismologists. It is customary at this time, as I pass the baton to the next SSA president, to make some remarks on a favorite topic that affects the practice or the future of seismology. I take this opportunity to offer some reflections on how technology influences the way we do our work in seismology. As... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".