MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334538937 · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.053842

Effective-medium approach to planar multilayer hyperbolic metamaterials: Strengths and limitations

2012· article· en· W2334538937 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMetamaterialIsotropyPlanarDielectricOpticsScatteringHomogeneousAnisotropyPhysicsMaterials scienceBoundary (topology)Computational physicsOptoelectronicsMathematical analysisMathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We express the optical properties of multilayered hyperbolic metamaterials (HMMs) in terms of the Fresnel reflection coefficients at the boundary between the metamaterial and the ambient medium. Formation of a band of bulk propagating modes in HMMs located far outside the lightcone of homogeneous isotropic media is demonstrated. Exotic behavior of HMMs, such as the broadband Purcell effect and suppressed outward scattering, is reproduced. Conditions under which a metal-dielectric multilayer can be approximated by a homogeneous effective medium with extreme anisotropy (indefinite medium) are derived. It is shown that real multilayer HMMs usually have a smaller Purcell factor than the corresponding effective medium; however, the reverse scenario is shown to be possible due to an intermediary role of short-range surface plasmon excitations in the outermost metal layer in a metal-dielectric multilayer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it