MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334539038 · doi:10.2514/6.2011-7236

Testing of a 1 meter Mars IceBreaker Drill in a 3.5 meter Vacuum Chamber and in an Antarctic Mars Analog Site

2011· article· en· W2334539038 on OpenAlexaff
K. Zacny, G. Paulsen, Christopher P. McKay, B. Glass, M. Szczesiak, J. Craft, C. Santoro, Jeff Shasho, Alfonso F. Dávila, Margarita Marinova, Wayne H. Pollard, W. Andrew Jackson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMars Exploration ProgramMetreDrillRemote sensingGeologyAstrobiologyMars landingExploration of MarsCurrent meterEnvironmental scienceEngineeringPhysicsOceanographyMechanical engineeringAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we report on the development of a rotary-percussive sampling drill: the IceBreaker. The purpose of the drill is to penetrate at least 1 meter in icy-regolith and in ice, and acquire sub-surface sample for science analysis. The drill was tested at a Mars analog site in the Dry Valleys of Antarctica and inside a 3.5 meter vacuum chamber in icy-soil, ice and ice with 2% perchlorate. In all cases, the drill reached ~1 meter depth in approximately one hour. The average power was 100 Watts and Weight on Bit was less than 100 Newton. This corresponds to the drilling energy of 100 Whr. In each case approximately 500 cubic centimeters of sample was recovered and deposited into sterile bags.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207