MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334553529 · doi:10.1055/s-2006-945566

DETERMINANTS OF QUALITY OF LIFE IN SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN WITH CEREBRAL PALSY

2006· article· en· W2334553529 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuropediatrics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCerebral palsyPsychosocialGross Motor Function Classification SystemMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)Vineland Adaptive Behavior ScalePhysical therapyMotor skillPediatricsGross motor skillMicrocephalyClinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologyPsychologyPsychiatryAdaptive behavior

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to characterize the quality of life of children with cerebral palsy (CP) and identify factors associated with physical or psychosocial well-being. Methods: In this study, a consecutive sample of children (6–12 years) with CP was recruited. A parent and when feasible, the child completed the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) and the PedsQL. Predictor variables included: 1) biomedical (type of CP, severity using Gross Motor Function Classification System-GMFCS, microcephaly, neonatal difficulties); 2) developmental (IQ, behaviour problems using Strengths & Difficulties Questionnaire); 3) functional (motor function using GMFM, Vineland Scale-VABS); 4) personal (gender, age, motivation); and 5) environmental (school setting, family function using Impact on Family Scale-IOF and Parenting Stress Index-PSI).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it