Jumonji is a potential regulatory factor mediating nitric oxide-induced modulation of cardiac hypertrophy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Jumonji (jmj) is the prototypical member of the jmj domain-containing protein family. It regulates the expression of several genes, in particular genes involved in cardiac cell growth in the embryonic heart. The function of jmj in the mature or developed heart, however, is unclear. RESULTS: We propose that JMJ domain 2A family may be involved in modulating the development of cardiac hypertrophy through interactions with cell cycle-regulatory proteins, specifically retinoblastoma protein, cyclin D and transcription factor E2F, that lead to cell growth. Because nitric oxide can block the development of cardiac hypertrophy and upregulate both jmj gene and protein expression, we propose that jmj is a novel regulatory factor mediating nitric oxide-induced modulation of cardiac hypertrophy. CONCLUSION: Jmj may be a critical, previously unrecognized factor that 'counteracts' the development of cardiac hypertrophy. Biotechnology approaches to increase its expression may be a potential therapeutic strategy to mitigate the increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with cardiac hypertrophy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".