MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P-125 YI Utility of Post-Induction Trough Level Measurement in Planning Infliximab Maintenance Therapy for Pediatric IBD

2014· article· en· W2334705048 on OpenAlexaffabout
Popalis Cynthia, Peter Church, Joley Johnstone, Griffiths Anne

Bibliographic record

VenueInflammatory Bowel Diseases · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInfliximabRegimenMaintenance therapyTrough levelInternal medicineGastroenterologyConcomitantUlcerative colitisInflammatory bowel diseaseMaintenance doseSurgeryDiseaseChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multicenter clinical trial data in adults and children with IBD demonstrate that efficacy of infliximab correlates with drug levels at trough. Trough levels of 3–7 µg/ml are targeted. We measured infliximab levels early following 3rd induction dose in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), aiming to optimize individual maintenance regimens. Beginning September 2013 at SickKids Hospital, Toronto 56 children and adolescents (median age 14.4 years; 30 CD; 26 UC) initiating infliximab therapy via a 3-dose induction regimen were given first maintenance dose earlier than the conventional 8 weeks following 3rd induction dose. Infliximab trough levels, measured by ELISA at time of first maintenance infusion, were compared between CD and UC. Influence of disease activity (assessed by physician global assessment and PCDAI or PUCAI), serum albumin and hsCRP at baseline on post-induction early trough levels were assessed. Response to induction regimen was assessed using PGA and PCDAI/PUCAI at time of first maintenance infusion. Thirty CD patients infused in standard fashion (weeks 0, 2, 6) with mean dose of 4.7 mg/kg across the 3 doses had week 12 median trough levels of 9.66 (IQR 4.8–12.8). All but 1 received concomitant immunomodulation during induction (5 AZA; 24 MTX [8 subcut; 16 oral]). Nine (30%) CD patients had week 12 trough level of <5.0 µg/ml, suggesting that standard q 8 weekly maintenance regimen beginning at week 14 would have been suboptimal. Twenty-six UC patients (14 steroid dependent; 12 steroid refractory) received higher infliximab doses (mean of 3 doses 6.17 mg/kg, P = 0.0003 versus CD), often given more intensively (3 doses within 4-5 weeks in 13). UC patients were given first maintenance dose 4 weeks following 3rd induction dose, but median trough levels of 10.10, (IQR 2.6–13.0) were similar to those achieved among CD patients 6 weeks post 3rd infusion. Although similar in age and baseline disease activity, CD and UC patients differed with respect to gender (males 67% CD versus 35% UC; chi sq P = 0.017); concomitant steroid therapy (CD: 40%; UC: 80%; Fisher's exact test P = 0.0002) and immunomodulation (93.67% CD versus 15.38% UC; chi sq P < 0.0001) during induction. 26/30 children treated for CD compared with 10/26 treated for UC achieved steroid-free clinical remission post induction as assessed by PGA and PCDAI/PUCAI. 8/14 of the UC patients with continuing active disease had adequate trough levels (>3). Early post-induction trough level testing is useful in assessing primary non-response to infliximab and in planning of optimal maintenance regimen. In this pediatric cohort, patients with UC cleared drug more rapidly, requiring higher per kg dosing and a more intensive regimen to achieve comparable drug levels post induction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInflammatory Bowel DiseasesSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207