MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334754534 · doi:10.1037/a0027795

Examining physical activity trajectories for people with spinal cord injury.

2012· article· en· W2334754534 on OpenAlexafffund
Shane N. Sweet, Kathleen A. Martin Ginis, Amy E. Latimer‐Cheung

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Psychology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityQueen's University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOntario Neurotrauma Foundation
KeywordsTheory of planned behaviorSpinal cord injuryPsychological interventionLatent class modelInjury preventionPsychologyStructural equation modelingGerontologyPoison controlMedicineEnvironmental healthPsychiatrySpinal cord

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: It is crucial to understand long-term leisure time physical activity (LTPA) patterns of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) as the challenges of living with this disability heavily influence LTPA levels. The purpose of this study was to explore emerging LTPA patterns in a sample of persons with SCI over an 18-month period. In addition, the study aimed to investigate the influence of pressure ulcers, demographic variables, and theory of planned behavior (TPB) constructs on the emerging LTPA trajectories. METHOD: Participants (N = 541) were enrolled in the SHAPE-SCI study and responded to questionnaires assessing LTPA, TPB constructs and demographic variables. Latent Class Growth Modeling was used to detect emerging LTPA patterns and to test the influence of important demographic and theoretical variables. RESULTS: Four LTPA patterns emerged: inactive, increaser, decreaser, and stable active, representing 22%, 14%, 32%, and 32% of the sample, respectively. The presence of pressure ulcers resulted in a decline in LTPA among participants with a stable active trajectory. Finally, LTPA intentions were higher in all patterns compared to the inactive group. Injury severity, age, and years postinjury also distinguished the trajectories. CONCLUSION: Interventions should focus on increasing individuals' intentions and should be directed toward people who are older, have more severe injuries and have been injured for longer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.216
GPT teacher head0.543
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth PsychologySame topicSpinal Cord Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207