MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334757279 · doi:10.5414/cnp69193

Patient and technique survival of diabetics on peritoneal dialysis: one-centers experience and review of the literature

2008· article· en· W2334757279 on OpenAlex
Wei Fang, Xiao Yang, J. Kothari, Mukesh Khandelwal, David Naimark, Sarbjit V. Jassal, Joanne M. Bargman, D. G. Oreopoulos

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Nephrology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProportional hazards modelDiabetes mellitusInternal medicineSurvival analysisPeritoneal dialysisRetrospective cohort studyDialysisMultivariate analysisLog-rank testSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This retrospective study investigated the long-term patient and technique survival and sought to identify the predictors of mortality in diabetic patients receiving PD. METHODS: Patients, aged 17 years or more who commenced home PD between January 31, 1994, and December 31, 2001 were included. Clinical data were available for 358 patients out of 418 total patients who started PD during this period. They were followed until cessation of PD, death, or to January 31, 2003. Survival probabilities were generated according to the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess predictors of survival. RESULTS: A total of 358 patients were enrolled in the study. Among them, 139 patients (38.8%) were diabetics. The 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year patient survival rates were 91%, 76%, 66% and 47% in diabetics and 94%, 89%, 84% and 69% in non-diabetics, respectively. Median actuarial patient survival for diabetic patients (51.8 months; 95% CI 36.0 â 67.5 months) was significantly shorter than that of non-diabetic patients (log rank 14.117, p < 0.001). Death-censored technique survival rates at 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year were 90%, 83%, 67% and 58% in diabetic, and 94%, 87%, 77% and 70% in non-diabetic patients, respectively. Similar to patient survival, the median technique survival time was significantly shorter for diabetic patients (63.9 months; 95% CI 35.7 - 92.2 months) than that of non-diabetic patients (log rank 4.884, p = 0.027). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that advancing age was the only independent predictor of death in the diabetic patients, whereas higher age and wider pulse pressure were associated with mortality in non-diabetic patients. CONCLUSION: Long-term patient and technique survival for diabetic patients on PD seem to be improved compared to our previous report and other studies. The mortality of diabetic patients was predicted predominantly by advancing age. PD remains a viable form of long-term renal replacement therapy for diabetic patients with ESRD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it