Patient and technique survival of diabetics on peritoneal dialysis: one-centers experience and review of the literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diabetes is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This retrospective study investigated the long-term patient and technique survival and sought to identify the predictors of mortality in diabetic patients receiving PD. METHODS: Patients, aged 17 years or more who commenced home PD between January 31, 1994, and December 31, 2001 were included. Clinical data were available for 358 patients out of 418 total patients who started PD during this period. They were followed until cessation of PD, death, or to January 31, 2003. Survival probabilities were generated according to the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess predictors of survival. RESULTS: A total of 358 patients were enrolled in the study. Among them, 139 patients (38.8%) were diabetics. The 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year patient survival rates were 91%, 76%, 66% and 47% in diabetics and 94%, 89%, 84% and 69% in non-diabetics, respectively. Median actuarial patient survival for diabetic patients (51.8 months; 95% CI 36.0 â 67.5 months) was significantly shorter than that of non-diabetic patients (log rank 14.117, p < 0.001). Death-censored technique survival rates at 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year were 90%, 83%, 67% and 58% in diabetic, and 94%, 87%, 77% and 70% in non-diabetic patients, respectively. Similar to patient survival, the median technique survival time was significantly shorter for diabetic patients (63.9 months; 95% CI 35.7 - 92.2 months) than that of non-diabetic patients (log rank 4.884, p = 0.027). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that advancing age was the only independent predictor of death in the diabetic patients, whereas higher age and wider pulse pressure were associated with mortality in non-diabetic patients. CONCLUSION: Long-term patient and technique survival for diabetic patients on PD seem to be improved compared to our previous report and other studies. The mortality of diabetic patients was predicted predominantly by advancing age. PD remains a viable form of long-term renal replacement therapy for diabetic patients with ESRD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".