MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334791957 · doi:10.2514/6.2013-441

Development and Integration of a Mini Corer Drill

2013· article· en· W2334791957 on OpenAlex
Dale Boucher

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrillChassisDrillingRobot end effectorRobotic armMechanical engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceRobotMarine engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

THE Canadian Space Agency (CSA) as part of its Exploration Surface Mobility (ESM) project has been developing ISRU specific tools capable of utilization at the end of a robotic manipulator arm. The Mini Corer Drill is a two-piece sample acquisition and encapsulation tool designed for use as an end effector tool for small and medium manipulator arms on rovers and landers. The Mini Corer system consists of a drill unit, attached as an end effector on a robotic manipulator arm, and a sample handling unit, mounted on a rover chassis. The Drill Unit is deployed and stabilized during operations by a robotic arm, thus the reaction forces, which must be absorbed by the arm, must be minimized. This precludes the use of rotation only coring and requires the use of percussive assist in the drilling. This percussion is imparted using a top hammer concept, already well proven in the mining industry. The Sample Handling Unit is mounted on the rover chassis and provides a method for storage and encapsulation of the drill rods and acquired samples. It is a simple carousel system with 10 storage slots as well as a storage location for a Rock Abrasion Tool, essentially another drill rod with a closed face bit. Sample acquisition and handling takes on a primary role of maintaining sample integrity for loosely consolidated material. This paper will present the progress and results of the final testing of the Mini Corer and the integration of the unit to a 1.2 Metre arm for Canadian Space Agency use in field trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it