Preclinical Evaluation of Oral Metronomic Topotecan and Pazopanib for the Treatment of Aggressive Extracranial Pediatric Solid Tumors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low Dose Metronomic (LDM) chemotherapy, combined with VEGF pathway inhibitors, is a highly effective strategy to coordinately inhibit angiogenesis and tumor growth. We have tested the efficacies of daily oral LDM topotecan alone and in combination with pazopanib, in three pediatric extracranial solid tumors mouse models. We also investigated the effect of prolonged combination therapy with the combination on tumor behavior in a neuroblastoma mouse xenograft model.\nIn-vitro dose-response study of topotecan and pazopanib was conducted on several cell lines. In-vivo antitumor efficacies of drugs, as single agents and combination, were tested in immunodeficient mice models. For studying the mechanisms of resistance to our therapy, a time-response study (28, 56 and 80 days) was conducted in SK-N-BE(2) xenografts model, treated in same way as earlier. \nIn vitro, topotecan caused a dose-dependent decrease in viabilities of all cell lines, while pazopanib did not. In vivo, the combination of topotecan and pazopanib demonstrated significant anti-tumor activity compared to the respective single agents in all models. Reductions in the levels of viable Circulating Endothelial Progenitors and/or Circulating Endothelial Cells and tumor microvessel density were correlated with tumor response and therefore confirmed the antiangiogenic activity of the regimens. However, the combination also caused significantly higher myelotoxicity than single agents. Pharmacokinetic study did not reveal any interaction between the two co-administered drugs. \nIn the time-response study, we found that only combination treated animals survived till 80 days. However, tumors in these animals started growing gradually after 50 days. Unlike single agents, all three durations of combination treatment significantly lowered tumor microvessel densities, compared to the control. However, tumors treated with the combination for 56 and 80 days had higher pericyte coverage. The combination increased the hypoxia, angiogenic expression and proliferative index and caused metabolic reprogramming of tumor cells.\nWe conclude that the combination of LDM topotecan and pazopanib has superior efficacy than either single agents, which is attributed to superior antiangiogenic activity. However, prolonged treatment with the combination can have additive myelotoxicity and may encounter adaptive resistance associated with metabolic reprogramming and increased proliferation of the tumor cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".