Malignant Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumour: Long-Term Survival
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The patient is a previously healthy 19-month-old child who became symptomatic in October 1998 with right hand weakness and cessation of new words with progression of right sided weakness and decreased sensation over the next month. The computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans demonstrated a large, deep, left frontal periventricular enhancing mass with several cystic areas. A left frontoparietal craniotomy was performed and the tumour was grossly resected. The pathological diagnosis was AT/RT. Grossly, the tumour was composed of firm, pink-tan hemorrhagic tissue. Sections showed a densely cellular, infiltrating neoplasm with areas of necrosis (some calcified), fascicular and focal sheets of collagen, and a variable, often prominent reticulin network. There was no endothelial proliferation. Light microscopy with hematoxylin and eosin stain (Figure 1) revealed a varied tumour appearance predominantly composed of larger tumour cells, with randomly dispersed nests of small undifferentiated cells close to the interface of tumour and normal brain tissue. The larger cells had several growth patterns: some were loosely arranged bi- or multi-polar cells forming cords and acinar structures against a faintly basophilic mucinous background, some were elongated cells arranged in coarse follicles or other compact bundles, while others were arranged in sheets or nests with prominent, sometimes glassy eosinophilic and cytoplasmic inclusions and eccentric nuclei (rhabdoid cells). Larger cells had nuclei with vesicular chromatin and prominent nucleoli, and smaller cells had hyperchromatic nuclei. Mitoses were focally numerous with some atypical in form, and cytoplasmic glycogen was inconspicuous. Immunohistochemical studies revealed widespread staining for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), vimentin (Figure 2), glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP), groups of cells with membranous patterns of staining for CD99, regional staining for neuron-specific enolase (NSE), scattered staining for transthyretin, and rare staining for actin, cytokeratin, and synaptophysin. The tumour was positive for chromosome 22 monosomy. Electron microscopy showed polygonal cells arranged in ill-defined acini that formed inconspicuous, sometimes entwined short microvillus processes. Variable numbers of intermediate filaments were identified and some cells showed a rudimentary basal lamina. Desmosomes were not seen, and there was no evidence of neural differentiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".