MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334909163 · doi:10.1144/sp350.8

Geological setting, alteration, and fluid inclusion characteristics of Zaglic and Safikhanloo epithermal gold prospects, NW Iran

2011· article· en· W2334909163 on OpenAlexaff
Susan Ebrahimi, Saeed Alirezaei, Yuanming Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Special Publications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyInclusion (mineral)GeochemistryFluid inclusionsMining engineeringMineralogySeismologyHydrothermal circulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Zaglic and Safikhanloo epithermal gold prospects are located in the Arasbaran zone, to the west of the Cenozoic Alborz-Azarbaijan magmatic belt in NW Iran. Mineralization is mainly restricted to quartz and quartz -carbonate veins and veinlets. Pyrite is the main sulphide, associated with subordinate chalcopyrite and bornite. Gold occurs as microscopic and submicroscopic grains in quartz and pyrite. The country rocks are Tertiary intermediate–mafic volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks of andesite to trachy-andesite composition intruded by a composite granitic to syenitic pluton. They are medium- to high-K, calc-alkaline and alkaline rocks and display fractionated REE (rare earth element) patterns, with light rare earth elements (LREE) significantly enriched relative to the heavy rare elements (HREE). On primitive mantle normalized plots, they display depletions in Nb, Ti and P, and enrichments in Pb, which are common characteristics of arc-related magmas worldwide. Hydrothermal alteration minerals developed in the wall rocks include quartz, calcite, pyrite, kaolinite, montmorillonite, illite, chlorite, and epidote. Minor alunite occurs in Safikhanloo. Gold is locally enriched in the altered rocks immediate to the veins. The ore-stage quartz from both prospects is dominated by liquid-rich fluid inclusions; vapour-rich inclusions are rare. The homogenization temperature varies between 170–230 and 170–330 °C and salinity varies between 1.4 to 9.5 and <1 to 6.7 wt% NaCl equivalent, for Safikhanloo and Zaglic, respectively. The occurrence of hydrothermal breccias, bladed calcite, adularia, and rare coexisting vapour- and liquid-dominant inclusions suggest that boiling occurred in the course of the evolution of the ore fluids. The large variations in Th and the salinity values can be explained by boiling and/or mixing. Lack of sulphate minerals in the veins suggests that sulphides and gold precipitated from a reduced, H 2 S-dominant fluid. Calculated δ 34 S values for the ore fluid vary between −4.6 and −9.3‰. Sulphur could have been derived directly from magmatic sources, or leached from the volcanic and plutonic country rocks. Ore formation in Zaglic and Safikhanloo occurred in response to mixing, boiling, and interactions with wall rocks. Considering the intermediate-argillic alteration, the low contents of base metal sulphides, and the overall low salinities, the Zaglic and Safikhanloo can be classified as low-sulphidation epithermal systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Special PublicationsSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207