MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334952904 · doi:10.1021/jp509633h

Dihydrogen Bonding in Compressed Ammonia Borane and Its Roles in Structural Stability

2014· article· en· W2334952904 on OpenAlexafffund
Yansun Yao, Xue Yong, John S. Tse, Michael J. Greschner

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHydrogen Storage and Materials
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsAmmonia boraneHydrogen bondChemistryMoleculeCrystallographyCovalent bondStackingIntramolecular forceHydrogen storageCharge densityComputational chemistryChemical physicsHydrogenStereochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Theoretical structure prediction calculations have revealed that the conformation of ammonia borane (NH 3 BH 3 ) in the crystalline state can be modified by pressure, changing from the staggered configuration at low pressure to an eclipsed geometry at high pressure. At low pressure, the crystalline structure is stabilized by the charge transfer N—H δ+ ··· δ− H—B dihydrogen interactions. In the high pressure polymorphs, the NH 3 BH 3 is predicted to form a layered structure. The N—H δ+ ··· δ− H—B bonding is still predominant within the layer. The stacking of the layers, however, is determined by the occurrence of additional homopolar B—H δ− ··· δ− H—B interaction unprecedented in NH 3 BH 3 and facilitated by the eclipsed conformation. This bonding is shown to be the result of secondary interactions between BH 3 groups from molecules of adjacent layers. Topological analysis of the charge density and perturbation calculations on the molecule fragments show unambiguously that the B—H δ− ··· δ− H—B interaction is covalent in nature with the bond strength comparable to a conventional hydrogen bond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicHydrogen Storage and MaterialsFrench-language works237,207