MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335094569 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.02.006

Crowdsourced estimation of cognitive decline and resilience in Alzheimer's disease

2016· review· en· W2335094569 on OpenAlexafffund
Genevera I. Allen, Nicola Amoroso, Catalina Anghel, Venkatachalapathy S. K. Balagurusamy, J Christopher Bare, Derek Beaton, R. Bellotti, David A. Bennett, Kevin L. Boehme, Paul C. Boutros, Laura Caberlotto, Cristian Caloian, F C Campbell, Elias Chaibub Neto, Yu‐Chuan Chang, Beibei Chen, Chien‐Yu Chen, Ting‐Ying Chien, Tim W. Clark, Sudeshna Das, Christos Davatzikos, Jieyao Deng, Donna Dillenberger, Richard Dobson, Qilin Dong, Jimit Doshi, Denise Duma, Rosangela Errico, Güray Erus, Evan Everett, David W. Fardo, Stephen Friend, Holger Fröhlich, Jessica Gan, Peter St George‐Hyslop, Satrajit Ghosh, Enrico Glaab, Robert C. Green, Yuanfang Guan, Mingyi Hong, Chao Huang, Jinseub Hwang, Joseph G. Ibrahim, Paolo Inglese, Anandhi Iyappan, Qijia Jiang, Yuriko Katsumata, John Kauwe, Arno Klein, Dehan Kong, Roland Krause, Emilie Lalonde, Mario Lauria, Eunjee Lee, Xihui Lin, Zhandong Liu, Julie Livingstone, Benjamin A. Logsdon, Simon Lovestone, Tsung‐Wei Ma, Ashutosh Malhotra, Lara M. Mangravite, Taylor J. Maxwell, Emily Merrill, John Nagorski, Aishwarya Alex Namasivayam, Manjari Narayan, Mufassra Naz, Stephen Newhouse, Thea Norman, Ramil Nurtdinov, Yen‐Jen Oyang, Yudi Pawitan, Shengwen Peng, Mette A. Peters, Stephen Piccolo, Paurush Praveen, Corrado Priami, Veronica Y. Sabelnykova, Philipp Senger, Xia Shen, Andrew Simmons, Aristeidis Sotiras, Gustavo Stolovitzky, Sabina Tangaro, Andrea Tateo, Yi‐An Tung, Nicholas J. Tustison, Erdem Varol, George Vradenburg, Michael W. Weiner, Guanghua Xiao, Lei Xie, Yang Xie, Jia Xu, Hojin Yang, Xiaowei Zhan, Yunyun Zhou, Fan Zhu, Hongtu Zhu, Shanfeng Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
FundersNational Institute on AgingUniversity of California, San FranciscoUniversity of California, San DiegoGenentechNational Institutes of HealthIXICONational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of California, Los AngelesEuropean Medicines AgencyServierEisaiNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationIllinois Department of Public HealthRush UniversityUniversity of WashingtonAlzheimer’s Research UKPfizerBiogenBioClinicaMcGill UniversityNational Institute of Mental HealthTakeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A.European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and AssociationsMedpaceSanofiSynarcUniversity of Southern CaliforniaAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeMeso Scale DiagnosticsAlzheimer's AssociationBrightFocus FoundationEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers SquibbNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
KeywordsResilience (materials science)Cognitive declineEstimationCognitionDiseaseAlzheimer's diseaseCognitive psychologyPsychologyCognitive agingGerontologyMedicineDementiaNeurosciencePathologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Identifying accurate biomarkers of cognitive decline is essential for advancing early diagnosis and prevention therapies in Alzheimer's disease. The Alzheimer's disease DREAM Challenge was designed as a computational crowdsourced project to benchmark the current state-of-the-art in predicting cognitive outcomes in Alzheimer's disease based on high dimensional, publicly available genetic and structural imaging data. This meta-analysis failed to identify a meaningful predictor developed from either data modality, suggesting that alternate approaches should be considered for prediction of cognitive performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations94
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryFrench-language works237,207