MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Heavily Smoking Women Who Cannot Quit in Pregnancy: Evidence of Pharmacokinetic Predisposition

2001· article· en· W2335126655 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Selby, Richard Hackman, Bhushan Kapur, Julia Klein, Gideon Koren

Bibliographic record

VenueTherapeutic Drug Monitoring · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSmoking Behavior and Cessation
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenSickKids Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCotinineMedicineNicotinePregnancyGestationPopulationObstetricsSmoking cessationInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY: Smoking in pregnancy is associated with a well-characterized increase in perinatal risks. Despite their wish to discontinue smoking, some pregnant women cannot stop. To characterize nicotine and cotinine levels in women who could not quit smoking after the first trimester, the authors recruited 19 white women (age 17-41 years) between 14-23 weeks of gestation who could not quit smoking. They started smoking at ages 11-22 years (mean 14.5) and smoked for 17 +/- 6 years. They had their first cigarettes 5-60 minutes after waking up (mean 12). Nicotine levels were compared with those expected in white patients in the general population, and the cotinine levels per cigarette smoked were compared with the population-based values. Sixteen of the 19 women had nicotine levels substantially lower than those expected. The mean level of serum cotinine produced by one cigarette per day was 19.1 +/- 15.8 ng/mL (range 6.1-67). The expected levels in white patients in the general population are 13 +/- 7.7 ng/mL. The data suggest that pregnant women who cannot quit heavy smoking in the second trimester form a selective group with pharmacokinetic predisposition to a high rate of nicotine metabolism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.645

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTherapeutic Drug MonitoringSame topicSmoking Behavior and CessationFrench-language works237,207