MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335220326 · doi:10.2514/6.2010-3374

Analysis and Asymmetric Sizing of CMOS Circuits for Increased Transient Error Tolerance

2010· article· en· W2335220326 on OpenAlex
Mudassar Nisar, Irtaza Barlas, Michael Roemer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Infotech@Aerospace 2010 · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiation Effects in Electronics
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCMOSSizingTransient (computer programming)Transient analysisElectronic circuitElectronic engineeringComputer scienceSoft errorError analysisReliability engineeringElectrical engineeringTransient responseEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanometer circuits are highly susceptible to transient errors due to atmospheric charged-particle or alpha-particle strikes. The susceptibility to transient errors is increasing in scaled-technologies as device scaling reduces node capacitances and voltage scaling reduces operating noise margins. This paper presents a novel methodology to increase the transient error tolerance in CMOS circuits by asymmetrically sizing the critical nodes according to their majority state. Majority state of a gate is defined as the output state of a gate which is true for a large number of gate inputs. The delay and power overhead of the proposed methodology is minimal compared to other transient error tolerance techniques. Using SPICE simulation, it is validated on ISCAS’85 benchmark circuits that the proposed methodology results in fewer transient errors propagating to primary outputs of the circuits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it