MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335489851 · doi:10.1103/physreve.86.051605

Effects of nonlinear interfacial kinetics and interfacial thermal resistance in planar solidification

2012· article· en· W2335489851 on OpenAlexafffund
Benoit Palmieri, C. A. Ward, Marcus Dejmek

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSolidification and crystal growth phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCanadian Space Agency
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsSupercoolingClassification of discontinuitiesInterfacial thermal resistanceMaterials sciencePlanarDiscontinuity (linguistics)MechanicsThermodynamicsThermal resistanceInstabilityThermalSteady state (chemistry)Boundary value problemFront (military)Nonlinear systemCondensed matter physicsPhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large temperature discontinuities were recently measured at a solid-liquid interface during heat transport processes. These observations suggest that when heat flows between two phases, the interface is not well characterized by assuming thermal equilibrium. This can be of importance in rapid solidification processes. In this paper we consider a planar front model that solidifies from its undercooled melt. We use a generalized interfacial boundary condition that includes nonlinear kinetic effects and allows for a temperature discontinuity. The effects of the new boundary condition on the solidification rates and the temperature profile are reported as a function of time. Our analysis shows that the undercooling regime where constant phase-front velocities are observed at steady states (traveling-wave solutions) are unaffected by the new boundary conditions. These solutions arise when the Stephan number is larger than 1. On the other hand, the solidification rates and the steady-state velocities are greatly affected by the assumed conditions at the interface. Incorporation of an interface thermal resistance, or Kapitza resistance, generates temperature discontinuities at the interface, leads to reduced solidification rates and the Mullins-Sekerka instability arises at longer wavelengths deformation of the planar front.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicSolidification and crystal growth phenomenaFrench-language works237,207