Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Caswell's collection is best read within the context of awarenessseeking nature writing, the kind Scott Slovic identifies in his 1992 book, Seeking Awareness in American Nature Writing.Slovic writes, "what is it, I wonder, that enables us to move beyond passivity and inattentiveness to participate deeply in the life of a place" (172).At their best, Caswell's essays serve as examples of deep attention.Mundane details and lived experience are rendered in such a way that they become intimate invitations into the world of matter and spirit: unintentionally killing a snake that is strangling a hawk in southeast Wyoming, hiking with a swift-moving, bear-seeking "wild man" in Hokkaido, or, most memorably, "rescuing" a troubled student during a backpacking trip after the discovery of a selfinflicted wound.Each of these events provides occasions for deep awareness, and each beautifully matches the act of walking with the act of self and social interrogation.At times, unfortunately, the author strikes a pedantic tone, favoring generalities over details: "the exterior landscape and its creatures are an inseparable part of the interior landscape" (104).Elsewhere he falls short with stylistic experimentation, notably when using the second-person: "Go a little hungry.If you are satisfied you will be too busy inside and have trouble hearing what the spring might say" (67).On the whole, An Inside Passage celebrates the best of ecopsychology in contemporary American nature writing.It explores the complex interrelationship between the trajectory of our lives and the places in which we live them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it