MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335573494 · doi:10.2118/175992-ms

Montney Unconventional Gas Play: Managing Choke Wear Using Flow Coefficient Diagnostics

2015· article· en· W2335573494 on OpenAlexaffabout
L. E. Grant

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChokeSimulationWorkflowEngineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The objective of this project was to improve wellsite safety, optimize choke life, and reduce downtime in highly erosive Dawson Montney (British Columbia, Canada) gas wells through use of real-time flow coefficient (Cv) diagnostics. This was achieved by developing a methodology to trend well behaviour, characterize wear patterns and create Wear Reports based on user defined set-points. A 2-phase flow coefficient equation was used to reduce error in higher liquid-gas-ratio wells and to improve universality. Percent Cv deviation (%Dev) is introduced and calculated in relation to the theoretical choke curves and acts as a key wear indicator. A custom Steady-State Slope-Fitting algorithm and workflow was developed to numerically characterize choke behavior. Using well specific slope durations based on flow behavior as well as elimination of statistical outliers, reliable slopes can be calculated. Logical statements comparing the slopes of key parameters to user adjustable setpoints identify wear patterns and create a shortlisted "Wear Report". These wells can be quickly validated using a custom Spotfire based visualization template. A subset of the Dawson Montney Field (107 wells) was originally piloted to validate methodology. Two generalized wear signatures (for auto and manual choke control) were theorized and vetted using a combination of wear trends and failure analyses which showed high internal wear. By comparing slopes of flow rate, choke position, and %Dev to set-point values, wear signatures can be identified. Workflow was easily adapted to be effective with the Dawson Montney standard choke type as well as a new choke pilot. Many wells have exhibited wear signatures and have been correctly identified by the software, thus increasing safety between scheduled onsite choke condition checks. Early indicators have been communicated to field personnel and well specific plans have been made to replace chokes. In many cases, early detection has allowed pre-planning of onsite work to minimize well downtime (from 24–48 hours downtime to 4 hours or less) and maximize cash flow generation ($10–20k accelerated, using typical rates and netbacks). This program has now expanded to over 400 Montney wells and will be monitored by a continuously manned Operation Control Center. Use of a slope fitting algorithm to numerically describe flow/wear behavior, creation of prelim wear set points/limits, and the wear signature identification logic is a novel approach to detecting and mitigating issues related to choke wear, which ultimately improves safety and reduces costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207