Genetics and Heritability of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy and Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVE: To answer the following 3 clinical questions: (1) What is the evidence supporting a heritable predisposition for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL)? (2) What specific genetic polymorphisms have been associated with CSM and OPLL? (3) What is the evidence supporting a genetic basis for predicting postoperative outcomes for patients with CSM and OPLL? SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: OPLL and CSM are thought to be multifactorial conditions resulting from a combination of environmental and genetic factors. METHODS: A systematic review of the English language literature was undertaken for articles published between 1980 and November 7, 2012. The strength of evidence was determined by 2 independent reviewers using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria for studies addressing the first question of heritability and using the criteria set forth by the HuGENet Working Group in the Venice Interim Guidelines to address the last 2 questions of genetic association. RESULTS: Of the 118 citations identified through the initial literature search, a total of 23 articles remained after application of inclusion/exclusion criteria. The 3 family association studies related to question 1 supported the principle of an inherited predisposition to CSM and OPLL; however, the strength of evidence supporting these findings was low. Within the 19 case-control studies related to question 2, 2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (COL6A1/Intron 32(-29) and COL11A2/Intron 6(-4)) were observed at higher frequencies in OPLL cases than in controls in more than 1 study and may be associated with its development. There was insufficient evidence to support an association between CSM and any specific single nucleotide polymorphism or haplotype or to support the association of specific gene alleles with postoperative CSM outcomes. CONCLUSION: Existing family studies provide support for the principle of an inherited predisposition to CSM and OPLL. Multiple studies support the association of 2 collagen gene related single nucleotide polymorphisms with OPLL; however, there is insufficient evidence to support the association between CSM and any genetic polymorphism or to support a genetic predictor of surgical outcome. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: STATEMENT 1: Existing family studies provide support for the principle of an inherited predisposition to CSM and OPLL. STATEMENT 2: Two SNPs related to the collagen 6A1 gene (COL6A1/Intron 32(-29)) and the collagen 11A2 gene (COL11A2/Intron 6(-4)) have been associated with OPLL in multiple studies and may be associated with its development. STATEMENT 3: No statement can be made from the literature regarding the association of specific SNPs or haplotypes with CSM. STATEMENT 4: No statement can be made from the literature regarding genetic predictors of surgical outcome in the context of OPLL or CSM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.055 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".