MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2335623551 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100011227

Double Myxopapillary Ependymomas of the Filum Terminale

2011· article· en· W2335623551 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Nancy McLaughlin, Marie‐Christine Guiot, Line Jacques

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFilum terminaleComputer sciencePsychologyNeuroscienceSpinal cord

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Myxopapillary ependymomas (MPE) are benign spinal intradural tumors (WHO grade I) that characteristically occur in the conus medullaris/filum terminale region.They are slow growing tumors with a good prognosis and long-term survival.1 We report a rare case of double MPE occurring at both extremities of the filum terminale.In the light of the present case and an extensive review of the literature, we summarize the imaging characteristics and intra-operative findings that should be present when considering the diagnosis of double MPE.Knowledge of this entity should remind recall physicians to assess in detail the entire region of the conus medullaris/filum terminale to prevent missing the diagnosis of a second MPE.This is important since the surgical treatment should address both lesions. CASE REPORTA 28-year-old man previously in good health presented with a severe lower back pain that had increased over the last two months.The questionnaire was negative for lower extremity paresthesia or paresia, for voiding difficulty and for sexual dysfunction.Complete neurological examination was normal including perianal sensation and rectal tone.Lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed two isolated intradural lesions.The most rostral lesion located at L3-L4 measured 2.5 cm in its longest axis.The second, extending from L5-S2, measured 6.6 cm in its longest axis.Both lesions were heterogeneous in T1 and T2 and strongly enhanced after gadolinium injection (Figure 1, A-F).Complementary MRI of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→