MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336010093 · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000001829

Early Liberal Fluids for Sepsis Patients Are Harmful

2016· article· en· W2336010093 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kelly R. Genga, James A. Russell

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineScholarshipSeptic shockShareholderSepsisEmergency departmentColumbia universityFamily medicineLibrary scienceManagementLawSurgeryPolitical scienceCorporate governanceSociologyMedia studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 2Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Dr. Russell received funding from Ferring Pharmaceutical, Asahi Kesai Pharmaceuticals of America, and Cytoval; disclosed off-label product use (Selepressin); and received other support from Grifols La Jolla Pharmaceuticals Cubist (now owned by Merck) Leading Biosciences. He disclosed other support (he reports patents owned by the University of British Columbia [UBC] that are related to PCSK9 inhibitor[s] and sepsis and related to the use of vasopressin in septic shock. He is an inventor on these patents. He is a founder, Director, and shareholder in Cyon Therapeutics [developing a sepsis therapy]. He has share options in Leading Biosciences. He is a shareholder in Molecular You. He reports having received grant support from Ferring Pharmaceuticals that was provided to and administered by UBC). Dr. Genga is sponsored by Science Without Borders Scholarship Program. For information regarding this article, E-mail: [email protected]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care MedicineSame topicSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207