MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336053980

«Ministerium Justitiae». Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura [RECENSIÓN]

2012· article· es· W2336053980 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jorge Miras

Bibliographic record

VenueDeposito Adademico Digital Universidad De Navarra (University of Navarra) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJurisprudenceLawTribunalSupreme courtPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recensión de: William L. DANIEL, «Ministerium Justitiae». Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura (Official Latin with English Translation. Translated by William L. Daniel. Foreword by Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke, Prefect of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura), Wilson & Lafleur, Gratianus Series, Section Research Tools, Montréal 2011, 776 pp., 1 vol., tapas duras.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDeposito Adademico Digital Universidad De Navarra (University of Navarra)Same topicTheology and Canon Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207