Modelling CaCO3 Scale in CO2 Water Alternating Gas CO2-WAG Processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract CO2 Water Alternating Gas (CO2-WAG) is one of the main Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) techniques which is currently being implemented in the emerging pre-salt projects offshore Brazil. CO2-WAG consists of the alternated injection of CO2 and water in the reservoir for tertiary oil recovery. However, this process may lead to the enhanced deposition of CaCO3 in production wells. This may occur since, in a CO2-WAG scheme, CO2 dissolves in the water slug causing a decrease in the pH. At lower pH levels, carbonate rock is dissolved causing an increase in the carbon and calcium content in the water slug. As fluids are later produced, the operating pressure is reduced and dissolved CO2 is evolved from solution, causing an increase in the pH. At these less acidic pH levels, CaCO3 may become oversaturated and precipitate. In order to address each process involved in CaCO3 formation, an integrated modelling approach between aqueous scale prediction modelling, Vapour-Liquid Equilibria (VLE) modelling and reservoir modelling is proposed. In particular, acid equilibria and precipitation reactions coupled with the Pitzer equations are used to build the scale prediction model. The facility to calculate CaCO3 co-precipitation with other minerals, such as BaSO4, FeCO3, FeS, etc., is also introduced. Five different equations of state (namely SRK, PR, PRSV, PT and VPT) are used in VLE calculations to model the solubility of CO2 (or a mixture of CO2, H2S and CH4) in brine. To model the reactive flows in the reservoir, the advection-diffusion equation is coupled with the scale precipitation equations. The reactive transport model addresses carbonate rock-brine interactions and fluid flow through a porous medium. Once integrated in one single model, these equations have been shown to address all steps in CaCO3 formation relevant for CO2-WAG, i.e., the geochemical processes taking place in the reservoir and at the production wells, thus capturing the full dimension of the scaling problem. In addition, the proposed model has been successfully validated with experimental data on the injection of seawater adjusted to various pH levels into a CaCO3 packed column. The measured effluent pH levels and calcium concentrations were used to validate the model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".