MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336397865 · doi:10.5539/esr.v5n2p47

ULF/ELF Atmospheric Radiation in Possible Association to the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake as Observed in China

2016· article· en· W2336397865 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEarth Science Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEarthquake Detection and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesChina Earthquake Administration
KeywordsAzimuthMagnetometerPhysicsShock (circulatory)RadiationRange (aeronautics)SeismologyRoot mean squareGeodesyGeologyEnvironmental scienceAstrophysicsMagnetic fieldAstronomyNuclear physicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recordings of a search-coil magnetometer located in Yongsheng in the Yunnan province of China have been used to find atmospheric ULF/ELF precursors to the 2011 Tohoku earthquake (EQ) with M=9 which occurred on 11 March 2011 with a large epicentral distance of about 4100 km. The combined characteristics of the horizontal magnetic fields, the ratio of tangential and radial field components in the numerator and root mean square of ellipticity in the denominator, were used to detect seismo-related ULF/ELF signals. This value is found to increase before the EQ, and then to decrease during a few weeks, with a reliable maximum on 8 March (3 days before the EQ). We also analyzed azimuth distributions of pulsed radiation in the frequency range 2-5 Hz during the previous week before the main shock. This radiation reached a maximal value on 10 March - one day before the EQ date, and the azimuth of its source is estimated to coincide with the position of the main shock. The results are further compared with the ULF/ELF precursors of the same EQ observed at 3 stations in Japan by Ohta et al. (2013).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.236
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it