MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336447707 · doi:10.1002/mop.29884

Compact UWB bandpass filter based on simple radial stub resonator structure

2016· article· en· W2336447707 on OpenAlexaff
Abdelhalim A. Saadi, M.C.E. Yagoub, Abdelhalim Slimane, Abdelkader Taibi, R. Touhami, M.T. Belaroussi

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBand-pass filterStub (electronics)ResonatorElectronic engineeringMicrostripUltra-widebandMicrowaveFlatness (cosmology)Materials scienceAcousticsTopology (electrical circuits)EngineeringPhysicsOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, a new compact microstrip ultra-wideband (UWB) bandpass filter (BPF) is proposed. Using a new electrical model leading to a simple structure based on radial stub resonator (RSR), its originality resides in its noteworthy simple design approach where the filter response can be accurately adjusted by tuning three parameters only. The fabricated filter shows a good agreement between simulations and measurements whereas fulfilling UWB requirements, i.e., enhanced selectivity, good matching and flatness within the entire band of operation, and sufficiently constant group delay. With an overall size of 9.53 mm x 8.28 mm, a high compactness has been achieved, making this structure one of the most compact filters ever reported. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 58:1707–1710, 2016

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.867

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrowave and Optical Technology LettersSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207