Lending a Helping Hand: The Impact of Constitutional Interpretation on Taiwan's National Health Insurance Program, Health Equity, and Distributive Justice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI) program is by design a compulsory social insurance scheme financed predominantly by a progressive payroll tax. Since its introduction in 1995, the NHI has managed to reduce the number of individuals without health insurance from 41 percent to less than one percent. Studies have also shown that the NHI has had some successes in reallocating health resources from the rich to the poor. This chapter examines the role of Taiwan's Constitutional Court in shaping the NHI and therefore contributing to improved health equity. In contrast to the general perception that the pursuit of human rights is individualistic in nature, this chapter describes a series of constitutional interpretations in which the Taiwanese Court relied on collectivist values such as mutual support, risk sharing and vertical equity to uphold the NHI's compulsory enrolment policy, the practice of calculating NHI insurance premiums based on certain presumed minimum income, and the right of the government to limit the scope of the NHI benefit basket. It is argued that the Constitutional Court in these cases not only managed to protect the collective vision of the NHI from individual attacks, but it also enhanced the NHI's progressivity by ensuring that underprivileged beneficiaries have the right to receive proper government assistance with meeting their insurance premium obligations. Ultimately, however, the Court came short of proclaiming a constitutional right to health, and as a result it has limited further progress with respect to health equity in Taiwan. This chapter concludes by urging the Constitutional Court to pay heed to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which recently receives domestic legal status in Taiwan, and to recognize a robust constitutional right to health so as to facilitate Taiwanese people's equitable access to both medical care and underlying social determinants of health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".