MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336735841 · doi:10.2138/am-2016-5425

Some thermodynamic properties of larnite (β-Ca <sub>2</sub> SiO <sub>4</sub> ) constrained by high <i>T</i> / <i>P</i> experiment and/or theoretical simulation

2016· article· en· W2336735841 on OpenAlexaff
Zhihua Xiong, Xi Liu, S. R. Shieh, Sicheng Wang, Linlin Chang, Junjie Tang, Xinguo Hong, Zhigang Zhang, Hejing Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersDivision of Materials ResearchU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsBulk modulusCASTEPPseudopotentialHeat capacityCompressibilityThermal expansionThermodynamicsPhononIsobaric processDiamond anvil cellChemistryDensity functional theoryMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)CrystallographyCondensed matter physicsPhysicsHigh pressureComputational chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pure larnite (β-Ca2SiO4; Lrn) was synthesized at 6 GPa and 1473 K for 6 h by using a cubic press, its thermal expansivity was investigated up to 923 K by using an X-ray powder diffraction technique (ambient P), and its compressibility was investigated up to ∼16 GPa by using a diamond-anvil cell coupled with synchrotron X-ray radiation (ambient T). Its volumetric thermal expansion coefficient (αV) and isothermal bulk modulus (KT) were constrained as αV = 4.24(4) × 10−5 K−1 and KT = 103(2) GPa [the first pressure derivative KT′ obtained as 5.4(4)], respectively. Its compressibility was further studied with the CASTEP code using density functional theory and planewave pseudopotential technique. We obtained the KT values as 123(3) GPa (LDA; high boundary) and 92(2) GPa (GGA; low boundary), with the values of the KT′ as 4.4(9) and 4.9(5), respectively. The phonon dispersions and vibrational density of states (VDoS) of Lrn were simulated using density functional perturbation theory, and the VDoS was combined with a quasi-harmonic approximation to compute the isobaric heat capacity (CP) and standard vibrational entropy (S2980), yielding CP = 212.1(1) − 9.69(5) × 102T−0.5 − 4.1(3) × 106T−2 + 5.20(7) × 108T−3 J/(mol.K) for the T range of ∼298–1000 K and (S2980) = 129.8(13) J/(mol.K). The microscopic and macroscopic thermal Grüneisen parameters of Lrn at 298 K were calculated to be 0.75(6) and 1.80(4), respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.808

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207