MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336768714

An Early/Middle Devonian 40Ar/39Ar Age for the Charlevoix Impact Structure (Quebec, Canada) - An Approach Closer to Reality

2012· article· en· W2336768714 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elmar Buchner, M. Schmieder, W. Schwarz, M. Trieloff, J. Hopp

Bibliographic record

VenueMeteoritics and Planetary Science Supplement · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImpact structureGeologyDevonianImpact craterOrdovicianBrecciaDikeBasementOrogenyCarboniferousPaleontologyPaleozoicBaltic ShieldClastic rockGeochemistrySedimentary rockPrecambrianArchaeologyTectonicsGeographyStructural basin
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The ~54 km Charlevoix impact structure is hosted in ~0.9 Ga crystalline rocks of the Grenville Province of the Canadian Shield that are overlain by Middle Ordovician sedimentary rocks. Impactites mainly comprise impact melt rocks of variable appearance and textures, as well as pseudotachylitic breccia dikes in the shocked crater basement. Although the Charlevoix impact structure has been studied for a long time, no precise data for the age of the impact event exist. The maximum impact age is defined by the occurrence of shatter-coned Middle Ordovician limestones (~460-450 Ma) in downfaulted parts of the impact structure [1]. The southeastern part of the impact structure is overthrusted by the northern Appalachian front along the Logan’s Line. The Late Devonian terminal Acadian orogeny (~377 Ma [2]), thus, marks the minimum impact age [1]. Existing Age Constraints: The first K-Ar ages for impact melt rocks obtained by [3] yielded (recalculated) Carboniferous ages between 321 and 356 Ma for the Charlevoix impact structure. 40 Ar/ 39 Ar laser spot total fusion analyses of impact melt

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeteoritics and Planetary Science SupplementSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207