MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336944640 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22509

How do you write and present research well? 9—show and state what error bars represent

2016· article· en· W2336944640 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Gregory S. Patience, Bala Srinivisan, Daria C. Boffito, Paul A. Patience

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware System Performance and Reliability
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsStandard deviationConfidence intervalStandard errorError barStatisticsRange (aeronautics)MathematicsInterval (graph theory)Relative standard deviationTolerance intervalCombinatoricsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

What do error bars in graphs or uncertainty in variables ( ) represent? [1] (Multiple answers) Standard deviation, Standard error of the mean, Confidence interval, Instrument resolution Maximum and minimum of a range of measurements The correct expression for sample standard deviation is s ; it is for the standard error of the mean and for the confidence interval. Both (d) and (e) are acceptable together with s , , and , but we recommend the confidence interval.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.062
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.322
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0620.322
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0140.011
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0070.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1290.190

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicSoftware System Performance and ReliabilityFrench-language works237,207