MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2337049250 · doi:10.1144/0060571

The world according to gas

2005· article· en· W2337049250 on OpenAlexaff
Anita Odedra, Stuart D. Burley, Adam Lewis, Martin Hardman, Paul Haynes

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Petroleum Geology Conference series · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsBP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proven global reserves of conventional natural gas are immense, with some 5500 × 10 12 SCF recognized world-wide, sufficient for around 60 years supply at current global gas production rates. However, total global growth in demand for gas is expected to average 3.2% over the coming decade and is projected to double by 2025. Along with accelerating liberalization of gas markets, this growth in demand will generate huge opportunities for gas explorers and producers. The exploration and reservoir engineering challenges are to find and produce three times more gas over the next 20 years than the industry has found in cumulative total since 1970. Current estimates suggest that 50% of conventional gas resources have been discovered to date. These resources are well characterized and exploration will have to extend deeper into sedimentary basins, in deeper waters, and in new plays, as well as creatively re-evaluate current acreage, to discover additional conventional natural gas. Tertiary deltas will be a major exploration play over the next decade. In the future, unconventional gas resources will be used increasingly to supplement high volume demand in developed markets and as a major longer-term source of energy. Natural gas in low permeability sandstone reservoirs, coal beds and fractured shale already accounts for more than 25% of natural gas production in the USA. Additionally, enormous volumes of natural gas are generated by methanogenic bacteria during early burial in marine sediments, much of which then contributes to frozen methane hydrates on the continental slopes. At present, much of this unconventional natural gas is categorized as hypothetical and requires fundamental scientific research before it can be considered as an economic resource. Historically, the commercial imperative has been to find gas close to markets. Shipping of liquefied gas, liquid gas derivatives and potentially solid methane hydrates (LNG, GTL and GTS technologies) around the globe, are changing the traditional patterns of gas exploration, transportation and market supply as new producers and demand centres emerge. LNG has already been transformed from a small volume, exotic trade into a sophisticated global market and GTL is likely to follow, opening global gas exploration and production to deep waters and plays far removed from markets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1630.104

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Petroleum Geology Conference seriesSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207