Treatment of Olive Oil Mill Wastewater by UV-Light and UV/H2O2 System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Olive oil mills generates large volumes of wastewaters (OMW). The absence of legislation, which manages and obligates the treatment of OMW has led to the creation of large build-evaporation ponds as a solution for this environmental problem. The function of these ponds is the evaporation of wastewater during summer months. However, evaporation isn't enough to eliminate all wastewater in the rafts and this fact allows the generation of a great volume of concentrate wastewater with high organic load (COD = 0.5- 38 g O 2 /L). The environmental impact produced by the accumulation of polluted wastewater demands the design of processes for OMW treatment. In this sense, the influence of ultraviolet light (UV) and the combined system of UV/H 2 O 2 , in the degradation of organic matter of OMW, were studied. UV-light application at a short time (<30 min) implies a removal values in COD = 15-22%, total carbon (TC), total organic carbon (TOC) and total nitrogen (TN) in the range 34% to 43%. The turbidity elimination was registered in the range 68% to 70%. In the case of combined UV/H 2 O 2 system the removal percentages were 40-48% for COD, 39.4-51.9% for TC, 33.0-48.0% for TOC, 37.0-53.1% for TN, and 66.8-93.4% for turbidity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it