MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B15: In vivo analysis of repeated siRNA silencing on protein expression levels

2015· article· en· W2337242297 on OpenAlexaff
Hamidreza Montazeri Aliabadi, Parvin Mahdipoor, Hasan Uludağ

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGene silencingIn vivoSmall interfering RNARNA interferenceSurvivinCancer researchAngiogenesisBiologyCell growthIn vitroCellCancerCell cultureRNATransfectionGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An ever increasing number of anticancer drugs are under investigation, and enter the clinical setting targeting different tumor survival and/or growth mechanisms; however, development of resistance against the mechanism of action of even the most promising drugs seems to be inevitable and remains a major concern. RNA interference (RNAi) have shown considerable promise in silencing proteins involved in tumor vascularization, as well as intracellular pathways involved in cell proliferation and/or survival. Despite the apparent efficacy of this powerful tool (especially in vitro), our information about the factors affecting siRNA efficiency and the possibility of resistance development against the silencing effect are limited at best. This study focused on determining the possibility of resistance development against siRNA treatment as a result of repeated exposure to siRNA in vivo. Our preliminary experiments in vitro revealed an unaffected siRNA cellular internalization and reproducible silencing efficiency of selected targets. The expression level of other mediators involved in breast cancer cell survival and proliferation (notably survivin, JUN, JAK2, NFkB and STAT3) were, however, altered in siRNA treated cells. In vivo experiments in a xenograft model demonstrated a similar silencing efficiency at the mRNA level after each repeated dose, with little, if any, apparent resistance development to the siRNA therapy. We conclude that cells would respond to repeated siRNA treatments in a similar fashion after a temporary initial alteration. Citation Format: Hamidreza Montazeri Aliabadi, Parvin Mahdipoor, Hasan Uludag. In vivo analysis of repeated siRNA silencing on protein expression levels. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Tumor Angiogenesis and Vascular Normalization: Bench to Bedside to Biomarkers; Mar 5-8, 2015; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B15.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryFrench-language works237,207