MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2337545651 · doi:10.2335/scs.43.342

‘Drip, Call, and Retrieve’ Paradigm Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

2015· article· en· W2337545651 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Takahiro Ota, Masayuki Sato, Tatsuo Amano, Hiroshi Horikawa, Yuji Matsumaru

Bibliographic record

VenueSurgery for Cerebral Stroke · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal carotid arteryStroke (engine)Middle cerebral arteryRadiologyCardiologyIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The procedural time to recanalization is becoming a determining factor in managing acute main-trunk artery occlusion (MAO). Here we report our experience with 27 patients treated with endovascular techniques for MAO without the availability of full-time endovascular specialists.Between July 2012 and March 2014, we targeted 27 patients with acute MAO who received endovascular treatment. Of them, three were transferred to treatment support institutions for treatment (Drip, Ship), while for the remaining 24 patients, an endovascular specialist was called in from an outside medical facility (Drip, Call, and Retrieve).The three patients treated by the Drip, Ship paradigm included two men and one woman with a mean age of 77 (range, 64-85) years. The cerebral infarction was caused by cardiogenic embolism in two patients and by arteriosclerotic embolism in one patient. The mean time interval from the magnetic resonance imaging at our institution to arrival at a treatment support institution was 184 (range, 153-244) minutes, and the mean interval from onset to recanalization was 434 (range, 395-455) minutes.The 24 patients treated with the Drip, Call, and Retrieve paradigm included 11 men and 13 women with a mean age of 77 (range, 62-89) years. Fourteen were administered tissue plasminogen activator, and 21 had arterial fibrillation. The median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale was 15, and the median Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score on diffusion-weighted imaging was 8. Occlusion was observed in 5, 13, 5, and 1 case occurring at the internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery (M1), M2, and proximal basilar artery. The mean door to puncture time was 117 (range, 39-345) minutes, while the mean time interval from onset to recanalization was 319 (range, 175-555) minutes. A Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score ≥2a was achieved in 21 cases (87.5%), while a TICI ≥2b was achieved in 15 (62.5%). The modified Rankin scores at 3 months after treatment were 0-2 in five cases.The Drip, Call, and Retrieve protocol does not require patient transport and is an effective form of medical collaboration that can achieve earlier treatment initiation and serve as an effective educational system for endovascular specialists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSurgery for Cerebral Stroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→