Genetic linkage studies of a North Carolina macular dystrophy family
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: North Carolina macular dystrophy (NCMD) is a very rare autosomal dominant hereditary disease. Up to date there are three types of NCMD described and consequently named macular dystrophy, retinal: MCDR1, MCDR2 and MCDR3. The aim of this study was to perform linkage and copy number variation analysis for the family affected by NCMD followed by the selected candidate gene sequencing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study concerned a 3-generation, non-consanguineous Latvian family with NCMD. Genome-wide scan, copy number variation and non-parametric linkage analysis was performed. Analysis resolved the locus of interest to the 5p15.33 region. Two of the genes, iroquois homeobox 2 (IRX2) and iroquois homeobox 4 (IRX4), were selected and sanger sequencing was performed. RESULTS: Linkage analysis indicated a region on chromosome 5 for the analyzed family, corresponding to a genetic locus previously described for MCDR3 (5p15-p13). Chromosomal aberrations were not identified in the affected family members. An upstream intron variant (NM_001278634: c.-139G > A (rs6876836)) in IRX4 gene segregated with NCMD phenotype in the analyzed family. CONCLUSIONS: It is unlikely to be the causative mutation of NCMD due to its high minor allele frequency 0.3532. Therefore, the role of IRX2 and IRX4 genes in the pathogenesis of NCMD has not been proved. Considerable variability in visual acuity between individuals of the same age group in all the families examined was noted. No overlap between NCMD grade and family generation was seen in the family described in the present study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".