MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cisplatin chemotherapy in the treatment of BRCA1-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2009· article· en· W2337704846 on OpenAlexaff
Tomasz Byrski, Tomasz Huzarski, Rebecca Dent, Jacek Gronwald, Cezary Cybulski, Tadeusz Dębniak, Bohdan Górski, Jan Lubiński, Steven A. Narod

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChemotherapyInternal medicineCisplatinRegimenMetastatic breast cancerAnthracyclineResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsOncologyBreast cancerChemotherapy regimenProgressive diseaseCancerGastroenterologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1099 Background: Preclinical data suggest that women with BRCA1 related breast cancers may be particularly sensitive to chemotherapeutic agents that cause DNA damage such as cisplatin chemotherapy. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with BRCA1 positive MBC. Methods: This was a multicenter, open label, single arm study of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 given intravenously every three weeks until disease progression or toxicity. The primary objective was to assess antitumour activity of cisplatin, as measured by clinical benefit response (CR, PR, or SD ≥ 6 months). Eligible patients had locally recurrent or MBC, had 0–2 prior chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting, and had received prior therapy with an anthracycline. Patients were restaged every eight weeks. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of participating institutions. Results: A total of 15 patients were enrolled. Mean age was 48.1 years (range: 32 to 70). ECOG performance status scores were 0 (6 pts), 1 (5 pts), 2 (4 pts). All patients had a confirmed BRCA1 mutation (7 with C61G mutation, 7 with 5382 insC, 1 with 4153delA). Five patients (33%) were ER or PR + and none were HER-2+. Prior history of MBC chemotherapy included 1 regimen (4 pts) and 2 regimens (7 pts). Seven (46%) and 4 (26%) patients had complete and partial responses by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, for an overall response rate of 72%. Median duration of response has not yet been reached. In general, cisplatin was well tolerated. Neutropenia was the commonest toxicity with 33% grade 2 (6,7% and 0%, grades 3 and 4 neutropenia). No patients developed febrile neutropenia. Conclusions: Significant activity and favorable toxicity profile provides a basis for considering cisplatin for further evaluation in phase III trials for women with BRCA1 positive MBC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.540
Teacher spread0.407 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207