MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2337790049

Le respect de la vie privée et les inforoutes en République Démocratique du Congo

2001· article· fr· W2337790049 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Owenga Odinge, Émile Lambert

Bibliographic record

VenueLex Electronica · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le respect  de la vie privee est garanti dans presque tous les pays du monde, dont la Republique Democratique du Congo. Les textes juridiques internes et internationaux qui assurent la protection de la vie privee ont generalement ete edictes a une epoque ou l'on ne pouvait tenir compte de l’avenement des inforoutes. Cet article tend a rechercher, autant que faire se peut, les divers formes de violations de la vie privee pouvant etre commises sur les reseaux numeriques et les mecanismes de protection y relatifs. Sont abordees, en premier lieu, les violations effectuees par les pouvoirs publics. Nombreuses sont les atteintes a la vie privee autorisees par les normes juridiques etatiques pour raison de securite publique. Il en est ainsi des perquisitions electroniques, des visites de lieux et des saisies operees par des agents des services etatiques porteurs des titres reguliers et dans le strict respect tant de la procedure que des lois. Toutefois, il arrive que les agents d'Etat debordent le cadre de l’objet de leur mission ou agissent sans titre regulier. Du cote des atteinte perpetrees par les personnes privees, l'on pourra citer, a titre indicatif, la commission des delits de presse et la violation du secret professionnel, la prise de connaissance ou la soustraction frauduleuse des donnees a caractere personnel. Ces atteintes procedent de divers fondements, parmi lesquels on retrouvera les conceptions libertaires, les interets egoistes, l’ignorance des legislations etrangeres, le principe de la liberte de l’information, les raisons scientifiques ou celles d’ordre public. Un certain nombre de mecanismes juridiques permet neanmoins de combattre ou de refrener les violations de la vie privee. Tout semble graviter autour de la mise en œuvre d’une procedure pouvant enclencher des sanctions penales, civiles, disciplinaires ou administratives, hormis l’existence de certains mecanismes de protection particuliers tel que le droit de reponse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.201

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLex ElectronicaSame topicEuropean Criminal Justice and Data ProtectionFrench-language works237,207