Serum uric acid is associated with non-dipping circadian pattern in young patients (30–40 years old) with newly diagnosed essential hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed at evaluating the relationship between the circadian blood pressure rhythm and UA level in young patients (30-40 years old) with newly diagnosed essential hypertension. METHODS: The study included 62 essential hypertensive patients and 29 healthy controls (20 men, 35 ± 3 years) divided into two groups according to 24-hour ABPM results: 30 dippers and 32 nondippers. RESULTS: Nondippers showed significantly higher both serum UA levels compared to dippers and controls (6.1 ± 0.7, 5.2 ± 0.9 and 4.1 ± 0.9 mg/dL, p < 0.001, respectively); and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) (4.1 ± 2.2 mg/L, 3.3 ± 1.9 mg/L, and 1.4 ± 0.9 mg/L, p < 0.001, respectively). After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, smoking, creatinine levels, hsCRP and comorbidity, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed an independent association between serum UA levels and nondipper pattern (OR 2.44, 95%CIs 1.4-4.1, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Serum UA is independently associated with nondipper circadian pattern in young patients with newly diagnosed essential hypertension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".