MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2337885156 · doi:10.14288/1.0094067

Social communications in planning

2010· article· en· W2337885156 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P. C. Carney

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicResearch in Social Sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEnvironmental planningTelecommunicationsPolitical scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this thesis is to explore the role of communications in planning and to suggest the design specifications and constraints for a social communications delivery system which will enable planners to cope with the demands of an "information ecology" (Nanus, 1972, p.398) or environment characterized by increasing flows of information and complexity of information systems. In such an environment, there is a need to provide for an element of information in the overall planning process. The use of information in planning is described as "social communications", which we have defined as "the use of information/communications systems to achieve planning objectives normally incorporating an element of social change". Our theoretical framework is based on the concept that the societal forces behind the evolution of an information ecology may be first, the emergence of the postindustrial society (Bell, 1973) in which information, or knowledge, becomes a major resource; and second, the rising demands of citizens to participate in the decision-making process, particularly when such decisions affect them. In designing our social communications delivery system, therefore, we have attempted to incorporate public participation strategies as one mode of communication. The study reviews the relevant literature in the field of planning theory, public participation and communications. It describes the essential characteristics of traditional communications modes, and presents a case study in which a public participation program was used as a social communications mode. Finally, it presents models for "one-way" and "two-way" social communications systems for incorporating public participation in a social communications program, and for a social communications delivery system which includes all three elements, e.g. both "one-way" and "two-way" channels and public participation. The study concludes that the planner may utilize a social communication system if he has a need to disseminate information about projects and policies and at least a partial need to obtain response, or feedback, from his target groups. This is likely to be the case if he is planning for innovation. It also concludes the planner's success in utilizing social communications in the planning process will depend largely on his selection of the appropriate degree of participation and mode of communication. Other essential elements are the selection of relevant units of information and the design of an efficient information delivery system. The study is based mainly on a review of the literature and interviews with officials of the Canadian Radio and Telecommunications Commission and related agencies. The study also draws on the professional work of the author when she served as Assistant Director-General, Information, Canadian Habitat Secretariat, on the occasion of the staging in Vancouver of HABITAT: United Nations Conference on Human Settlements, May 31 - June 11, 1976.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicResearch in Social SciencesFrench-language works237,207